Delegated Authority Governance
on Salesforce: How MGAs Scale Without
Increasing Carrier Exposure
Why the next phase of MGA growth will be decided by controls, not capacity
Delegated authority is the engine behind modern MGA growth. It allows carriers to extend distribution, move faster in specialty markets, and scale underwriting without adding internal headcount. For MGAs, it unlocks speed, autonomy, and margin. But as MGAs scale, delegated authority quietly becomes one of the highest-risk surfaces in the insurance value chain.
What works at $20M in premium begins to break at $200M. Authority limits blur. Exceptions pile up. Referral rules weaken. Carriers lose confidence—not because MGAs are reckless, but because governance fails to scale with volume and complexity.
In 2026, MGA growth will no longer be constrained by underwriting talent alone. It will be constrained by how well delegated authority is governed, provable, and auditable at scale.
AI doesn’t introduce new authority risk—it accelerates whatever governance weaknesses already exist, pushing them into production faster and at greater volume.
00
Why Delegated Authority Becomes Risky as MGAs Scale
Delegated authority is fundamentally a trust model. Carriers trust MGAs to operate within defined underwriting limits, programs, and guidelines. That trust is manageable when volumes are low and teams are small.
As MGAs scale, complexity increases across every dimension—more programs, more carriers, more underwriters, more edge cases, and more pressure to bind quickly. Authority decisions multiply, but visibility into how those decisions are made does not.
Risk doesn’t spike overnight. It leaks gradually through small gaps: outdated guidelines, informal approvals, misapplied limits, or exceptions handled outside the system. Over time, these gaps compound into material carrier exposure.
At scale, delegated authority stops being a people problem. It becomes a systems problem.
00
The Hidden Failure Modes: Where Authority Exposure Actually Comes From
Carrier exposure tied to delegated authority almost never comes from obvious breaches. It comes from structural blind spots that remain invisible until volume exposes them.
Authority logic lives in PDFs instead of systems. Approvals happen over email or chat. Spreadsheets track limits that quietly drift from reality. Exceptions are justified verbally but never logged. Each workaround feels reasonable in isolation.
Collectively, they create a dangerous condition: neither the MGA nor the carrier can confidently answer whether a risk was bound within authority at the time of decision.
When these issues surface—often during audits, claims reviews, or program renewals—the exposure has already occurred. The problem isn’t intent. It’s the absence of enforceable, system-level controls.
00
What “Good Governance” Looks Like in a Delegated Underwriting Model
Good delegated authority governance is not about slowing underwriting. It’s about making authority explicit, enforceable, and provable.
At scale, governance must answer three questions in real time:
Who has authority?
Under what conditions?
Based on which version of carrier rules?
As MGAs introduce AI into underwriting workflows, authority logic must become machine-readable—because AI will execute exactly what the system allows, not what policy intended.
This requires moving authority out of static documents and into living systems. Governance becomes an operational contract enforced by workflows, not a policy referenced after the fact.
For executives, this isn’t a compliance exercise—it’s a growth enabler. When authority is clear and enforced automatically, teams move faster with less risk.
00
The Controls MGAs Need (Carrier / Program / Limit) — and Why Spreadsheets Fail
Delegated authority operates across multiple dimensions at once. Effective governance requires systems that can enforce:
Carrier-specific authority definitions
Program-level underwriting rules
Coverage and limit thresholds
Geographic and class restrictions
Role-based underwriter permissions
Spreadsheets cannot enforce these controls consistently or at scale. They lack versioning, logic enforcement, and audit trails. As underwriting volume increases, spreadsheets become a source of exposure rather than control.
00
Building Delegated Authority Workflows in Salesforce
Salesforce becomes a natural control plane for MGAs when authority governance is embedded into workflows instead of layered on top.
In a governed Salesforce model:
Authority rules are encoded at the carrier and program level
Underwriting actions are validated before bind
Limit checks happen automatically
Exceptions are routed, approved, and logged natively
This transforms Salesforce from a system of record into a system of control.
Underwriters don’t need to interpret guidelines manually. The system enforces them consistently, reducing both risk and cognitive load.
00
Referral Routing: When, Why, and How It Should Trigger
Referrals are not a failure—they are a control mechanism.
At scale, referral logic must be precise. Over-triggering slows the business. Under-triggering increases exposure.
Effective referral routing answers:
When a decision exceeds authority
Why the referral exists
Who is empowered to resolve it
What context must be reviewed
Salesforce-based routing ensures referrals are triggered deterministically, not subjectively. Each referral carries context, history, and decision rationale—eliminating back-and-forth and informal approvals.
00
Audit-Ready Underwriting: Decision Trails, Approvals, and Explainability
In delegated authority models, audits are inevitable. The question is whether they are painful.
Audit-ready underwriting systems capture:
Who made each decision
Under which authority
Based on which guidelines
With what approvals
At what point in time
This creates decision trails, not just transaction logs.
When carriers ask, “Why was this risk bound?”, the answer is not a narrative. It’s a system trace.
Explainability here is not about AI transparency alone—it’s about governance transparency.
00
Using AI Safely in Delegated Authority (Documents + Exceptions, Not Auto-Bind)
AI has a role in delegated authority—but not where many teams expect.
The safest, highest-value use of AI is not auto-binding. It is document intelligence and exception detection. AI can extract submission data, flag inconsistencies, identify guideline mismatches, and surface anomalies that require review.
In delegated authority models, AI should not decide what can be bound—it should decide what must be questioned.
Used this way, AI strengthens governance instead of bypassing it. Auto-binding without controls increases carrier exposure. AI-assisted underwriting, anchored in authority rules, reduces it.
00
Operational Dashboards MGAs and Carriers Care About
Governance must be visible to be trusted.
Executives and carrier partners care about:
Bind volume by authority tier
Referral rates and resolution times
Exception frequency by program
Authority utilization vs limits
Audit findings over time
When these metrics are available in real time, trust improves. Conversations shift from “Are we compliant?” to “How do we scale responsibly?”
00
Implementation Blueprint: 30–60–90 Day Rollout Approach
Delegated authority governance does not require a multi-year transformation.
A pragmatic rollout often follows three phases:
First 30 days: Map authority structures, programs, and carrier rules. Identify leakage points. Define referral criteria.
Next 60 days: Encode authority logic and referral workflows in Salesforce. Pilot with one carrier or program. Train underwriters on system-enforced decisions.
By 90 days: Expand across programs, introduce audit dashboards, and layer in AI for document ingestion and exception detection.
Progress is measured not by features delivered, but by exposure reduced.
00
Common Mistakes MGAs Make (and How to Avoid Them)
The most common mistake is treating governance as documentation instead of system behavior.
Others include:
Allowing informal approvals to persist
Using AI to bypass controls instead of reinforce them
Over-customizing Salesforce without clear authority models
Delaying audit readiness until carriers demand it
Each of these increases risk quietly—until it becomes visible.
00
Where to Start: Quick Wins That Reduce Carrier Exposure Fast
The fastest wins come from making authority explicit.
Start by:
Centralizing authority definitions
Eliminating email-based approvals
Enforcing limit checks at bind
Logging every exception with context
These steps alone materially reduce exposure and build carrier confidence—without slowing underwriting velocity.
00
Where V2Force Fits In
Delegated authority governance is not just a configuration challenge—it’s an operating model challenge.
V2Force works with MGAs and carriers to design Salesforce-native delegated authority frameworks that scale with growth. This includes authority modeling, workflow enforcement, referral routing, audit-ready decision trails, and safe AI integration.
The goal is simple: help MGAs grow without increasing carrier exposure—and help carriers extend authority without losing control.
Can your delegated authority model scale without increasing carrier exposure?
Assess whether your Salesforce workflows enforce authority, referrals, and auditability—or rely on trust alone.